Urban Initiatives — FY26 Workshop Program
Interactive dashboard · August 2025 – June 2026 · 133 sessions · 62 locations · 231 workshop codes
⚖ Global Filter:
Key performance indicators across all FY26 workshop programming
133
Delivery Board Sessions
Tracked from monday.com
3,046
Total Registrations
Parents + Staff PD
71,092
Youth Reached
Enrollment + PG self-reported + PEI
92.7%
Objectives Met
102 of 110 sessions
2,633
Feedback Responses
Across 4 survey types
9.2 / 10
Avg Recommend Score
All workshop types
6.63 / 7
Avg Content Rating
All Likert dimensions
62
Unique Locations
Schools & partner sites
Session Status — Delivery Board
Sessions by Category
Feedback Volume by Workshop Type
Recommendation Scores by Type (out of 10)
Key Takeaways
- 33% of sessions are Satisfaction Complete; 35% are Unfinished Series with more sessions planned into FY27.
- 85 of 133 delivery board sessions (64%) are linked to at least one feedback response via event code.
- All four workshop types scored above 8.9/10 on the recommendation scale.
- 62 unique school and partner locations served across Chicago in FY26.
Participant satisfaction ratings (1–7 Likert + NPS 1–10) combined across English and Spanish responses
Shared Dimensions — All Workshop Types (out of 7)
Grouped Comparison
Parent/Guardian
Recommend (÷10)9.39
Had Fun6.60
Facilitator6.66
Learned6.68
Play & SEL6.74
Well-being6.68
Community6.37
School Staff (General)
Recommend (÷10)9.40
Had Fun6.55
Facilitator6.68
Learned6.67
Play & SEL6.76
Behavior Understanding6.54
Positive Impact6.69
Recess & Student Behavioral
RECESS
Recommend (÷10)9.05
SEL Confidence6.64
Recess Confidence6.51
STUDENT BEHAVIORAL
Recommend (÷10)8.95
Behavior Understanding6.23
Confidence Handling6.14
Net Promoter Score Breakdown
Promoters = 9–10 • Passives = 7–8 • Detractors = 1–6 • NPS = % Promoters − % Detractors
Satisfaction Insights
- Play & SEL belief was top-rated across all groups — participants deeply internalize the core program message.
- Facilitator engagement scored 6.66–6.72/7 consistently across all workshop types.
- The Student Behavioral Growth workshop shows the most room for growth in confidence (6.14/7).
- Community connection among parents (6.37/7) is the lowest-scoring dimension.
Participation demographics and estimated downstream youth reach
1,793
Parent Registrations
2.3 avg children/household
1,253
Staff PD Registrations
75% new to Urban Initiatives
48%
Spanish-Speaking
Parent/guardian participants
71,092
Youth Reached
Enrollment + PG self-reported + PEI
Parent/Guardian Race/Ethnicity
Staff PD Role Breakdown
Staff PD Race/Ethnicity
School Enrollment by Workshop Type (matched schools only)
Language Breakdown by Form
Reach & Demographics Insights
- The 52%/48% English/Spanish split confirms bilingual programming is a core equity feature.
- 75% of staff PD participants had no prior UI affiliation — workshops are reaching new audiences.
- Parent participants are predominantly Latina/Hispanic (~59%) and female (~93%).
- 71,092 youth reached: 21,103 school enrollment (51 schools, deduplicated) + 705 PG at schools (2.42 avg × 292 attendees) + 62 org/CVCA (2.21 avg × 28 attendees) + 7,722 PEI household reach (2.24 avg × 3,442 attendees) + 41,500 PEI external reach count.
- School enrollment sources: SY26 Confirmed Schools roster (22 schools) + CPS public SY2023–24 data (29 schools). Each school counted once regardless of program types received.
All 133 sessions from the FY26 delivery board, linked to feedback data by workshop code
133
Total Sessions
On delivery board
85
With Feedback Data
Linked by event code
62
Unique Locations
Schools & partners
11
Stuck Sessions
Need partner follow-up
Top 15 Locations by Feedback Volume
Recommend Score by Location (≥10 responses)
📋 All Sessions
| Session | Location | Category | Status | Event Code | Date | Responses | Recommend | Fac. Rating | Facilitator | Attendees | Reg/Att | FB/Att |
|---|
🏪 Location Summary
| Location | Sessions | Responses | Registered | Avg Recommend | Avg Facilitator | Categories | Statuses |
|---|
110 facilitator reflections covering sessions delivered throughout FY26
110
Reflections Submitted
Across all session types
92.7%
Objectives Met
102 of 110 sessions
5,385
Direct Attendees Logged
Avg 49 per session
6.57 / 7
Avg Competency Score
Across all 7 dimensions
Competency Scores (avg out of 7)
% of Sessions Rated 6 or 7
Competency Detail
| Competency | Mean (1–7) | % Scored 6–7 | Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coaching Play | 6.67 | 97.3% | Strength |
| Meaningful Stories | 6.65 | 95.5% | Strength |
| Preparation | 6.64 | 89.1% | Strength |
| Conversation Flow | 6.54 | 93.6% | Good |
| Audience Engagement | 6.52 | 90.9% | Good |
| Organizing Physical Space | 6.50 | 88.2% | Develop |
| Training Flow (Objectives) | 6.46 | 87.3% | Develop |
Sessions: Objectives Met
Themes from Qualitative Reflections
✓ What Worked
- Game-based activities spark joy and organic SEL conversations
- Post-game debrief connects play to SEL competencies
- The “pop analogy” and emotion coaching resonated deeply
- Attention-getters kept energy high across groups
- Personal storytelling drove the most meaningful dialogue
⚠ Growth Areas
- Cultural relevance gaps for Latino/a participant groups
- Worksheets need better scaffolding toward application
- Time pressure — sessions feel rushed toward the end
- Participants struggle to contextualize SEL for their setting
- Winter procedures section generated low engagement
Registration and feedback volume by month, FY26
Monthly Registrations — Parent/Guardian vs Staff PD
Monthly Feedback Responses — All Survey Types
Facilitator Reflections by Month
Trend Insights
- Back-to-school (Aug–Sep 2025): Strong recess + staff PD activity — 362 staff PD registrations in August.
- Parent peak (Oct–Nov 2025): 812 registrations in October, 699 in November.
- Staff spike (Nov 2025): 480 school staff feedback responses — likely a large multi-school cohort.
- Mid-year wave (Feb 2026): 302 staff PD registrations + 94 student behavioral responses.
Open-ended responses from participant feedback surveys · 2,418 responses with text across 4 workshop types
2,418
Qualitative Responses
With at least one text answer
—
Rating Reasons
Visible after filter
—
Takeaways
What participants plan to use
—
Improvement Suggestions
What to do differently
🔍 Filter Responses
💬 Participant Responses
| Date | Type | Location | Code | Facilitator | Lang | Rec. | Sentiment | Field | Response |
|---|
📚 Facilitator Reflection Notes
| Date | Facilitator | Location | Code | Att. | Field | Note |
|---|